Merz under pressure: Critics speak of a historical break in the Bundestag!

Merz under pressure: Critics speak of a historical break in the Bundestag!

On January 29, 2025, a controversial application for tightening migration policy was decided in the Bundestag, which is considered a decisive turning point for many in the political landscape of Germany. The CDU and the AfD voted together for this application, which not only offset the traffic light coalition, consisting of SPD, Greens and FDP, but also triggers a broader social debate about political culture in the country. This is reported by the Rheinpfalz .

Rhineland-Palatinate Prime Minister Alexander Schweitzer, a member of the SPD, criticized the decision sharply. He accuses CDU boss Friedrich Merz that he has caused severe damage to political culture in Germany. Due to the collaboration with the AfD, Merz helped this party to a remarkable parliamentary success, which Schweitzer sees as unacceptable. The application stipulates that asylum seekers can be rejected at the German borders. This decision was supported by 187 members of the Union, 75 AfD MPs, 80 members of the FDP and six parliamentarians.

reactions to the application

The reactions after the vote were loud. Chancellor Olaf Scholz described January 29 as a "taboo break" and an "significant day in the history of the Federal Republic of Germany". He criticized the Union for giving up a consensus among the democratic parties that existed since the post -war period. Scholz emphasizes that this consensus included that the democratic parties should not work together with extreme right groups.

Britta Haßelmann, co-faction leader of the Greens, called the day a "historical day-in the negative sense". She was aimed directly at Merz and explained that he had "a high price" and had now become a "driven" of the AfD. However, Merz himself defended his approach and regretted that the majority was achieved in this coordination with the AfD.

political plans and applications

Friedrich Merz proposed to agree on a new migration law that the Union and the other parties should work together on a consensus draft by Friday. This was done against the background that the Union had rejected the SPD's proposals to improve security in the asylum area. This is seen as part of a larger game of the Union to focus more on migration policy, especially since this topic has been working on voters since 2015, as well as the mdr reported.

The migration -political positions of the parties vary greatly. Extremely right positions of the AfD are contrasting to the efforts of the SPD and the Greens to promote a humane asylum policy. While the CDU/CSU puts the return of rejected asylum seekers and security aspects in the foreground, the Greens are calling for an active refugee policy and fair asylum procedure.

The political landscape and the handling of migration are of great importance not only for the parties, but also for voters. Opinions are divided and more and more voters see the need for a change in migration policy, whereby the balance between security and humanity is repeatedly struggled.