Confusion about traffic attempt: City plans despite the retreat!
Confusion about traffic attempt: City plans despite the retreat!
The city is currently the focus of an official procedure that triggered a broad discussion about traffic measures and its legal basics. The occasion is the controversial announcement of the "partial confiscation", which the city does not have the necessary external impact. According to azonline.de there was confusion for both the plaintiffs and the judge, which led to a withdrawal of the general dispute through the city. The spokeswoman Andrea Zirkel described this as "incurable procedural error", since the partial collection should have been announced in good time.
The city wants to continue with a traffic attempt despite the return of the general decree to start in May. Mayor Eliza Diekmann-Cloppenburg at the same time announced the establishment of a new right-wing turn on Holtwicker Straße, which results from a participation process. The measures were commissioned on the basis of an accidental focus.
legal basics and application procedure
In the legal dispute over the partial collision, there was already a rejection notice from the administrative court, which confirms that the application for provisional legal protection was unsuccessful. The announcement of the partial collection took place on May 5th, 2014, and the Council had already decided on April 10th, 2014 to carry out the partial collection. The Voris.wolterskluwer-online.de is also guaranteed in an emergency.
The decision to implement the measures of partial confection was not regarded as an error or arbitrary. However, the applicants, Heiner Brinks and Martin Sicking, the owners of the "Action" market, fear a negative influence on their property and customer frequency. Tenants of the market have already indicated to question future rentals if the accessibility of the store areas is at risk.
criticism and claims by the plaintiffs
Brinks and Sicking expressed that their concerns in public citizens' information were not taken seriously, which is why they have taken legal action. They want their concerns to be heard about possible sales losses and the accessibility of their property. However, such economic concerns are not legally protected. The proceedings before the Administrative Court is subject to the Administrative Court of Administration (VwGO), which stipulates clear rules for lawsuit and urgent procedures, as described in Administrative Court--Karlsruhe. is.
Overall, it remains to be seen how the traffic attempt is implemented and whether the plaintiff's criticism is taken into account. A functioning interaction between the interests of the city and the concerns of the residents will be decisive in the coming months.
Details | |
---|---|
Quellen |
Kommentare (0)