Fraud process: Frankenthaler attracts with Mallorca trip without implementation!

On Tuesday, January 7th, at 1.30 p.m., the trial against a 25-year-old man from Frankenthal, who is charged with fraud, begins at the Frankenthal district court. The allegation refers to an incident in June 2024, in which the accused offered a trip to Mallorca via the internet portal "Kleinandenbeschen.de", which he had not to sell. A woman who reacted to the advertisement paid the accused 650 euros, but did not come to Mallorca.

In another case, the accused was convicted of fraud in a total of 85 cases. In this conviction, a total prison sentence of two years was pronounced, which was suspended for probation. In addition, the collection of a amount of money of EUR 29,372.80 was ordered, whereby the accused must also bear the costs of the procedure.

background and further details

The accused person had previously been convicted of fraud in three cases. This conviction, which has been final since May 22, 2018, included a fine of 60 daily rates of 10 euros each. In addition, the defendant experienced a custody of November 18, 2019 to January 23, 2020.

The accused's procedure not only included the fraud indicator for the trip to Mallorca, but also the sale of objects via Kleilercheben.de, which he did not deliver. He always acted with the deliberate deception of prospective buyers who transferred the purchase prices without maintaining the promised goods. Witnesses confirmed the deception and payments, and the accused confessed to his actions in the main hearing.

The chamber took into account both the accused and the possible future effects of the punishment in its judgment. The individual penalties were staggered, depending on the amount of the damage caused. Six months were imposed for damage under 200 euros, for damage between 200 and 500 euros seven months and for damage over 500 euros eight months. In the case of acts after the pre -trial detention, different punishments were expressed.

Overall, the total prison sentence of two years is considered as both crime and guilt. The decisive paragraphs that were used in this case are, among other things, sections 263 (1) and (3) sentence 2 no. 1 var. 2, 53, 54, 55, 56, 73 para. 1 and 73d StGb.