Dispute in Kaiserslautern: Guest injuries after a house ban!

Dispute in Kaiserslautern: Guest injuries after a house ban!

In the old town of Kaiserslautern, a tangible argument occurred in a local restaurant on Sunday night. Around 2 a.m. there was an argument between a 31-year-old guest and an employee of the gastronomy, which was due to a previously pronounced house ban. The employee had banned the guest because he had previously behaved unexpectedly.

The situation escalated when the guest grabbed a bar stool and tried to beat the employee with it. In order to calm the situation, the employee tried to guide the guest from the pub. But the 31-year-old defended himself violently, grabbed the employee on the sweater and pressed him, but remained without any injuries.

injuries and legal consequences

The guest, on the other hand, suffered a head injury, the cause of which remained unclear. The police were alerted and the 31-year-old is now being investigated for attempted dangerous bodily harm. A breath alcohol test carried out showed a value of 1.58 per thousand, which indicates that the guest was considerably alcoholic at the time of the dispute.

After the police measures, the failed person was first examined in the hospital and later released at the office.

ban in the catering area

The topic of the ban on the house raises legal questions. The operator of a restaurant is generally allowed to pronounce house bans. However, there must be a factual reason, especially in institutions that are open to general public traffic. According to the case law of the Federal Court of Justice, arbitrary exclusion is not easy; The rights of the persons concerned must be weighed up, such as dahg.de

In the present situation, the operator of the restaurant should have used clearer communication channels if necessary to inform the guest about the reasons for the house ban. Arbitrary exceptions can affect the guest's general right of personality, which could take legal action. A claim for pain and suffering could exist if the house was banned without an appropriate reason.

It remains to be seen which legal consequences arise from this incident and whether the affected guest initiates measures against the house ban. The event throws light on the challenges with which operators of restaurants are faced, especially when it comes to enforcing their house rights.