Žalba oštećena cijepljenjem: Dug put do pravde u Rhineland-Palatinate!

Žalba oštećena cijepljenjem: Dug put do pravde u Rhineland-Palatinate!

U Njemačkoj je barem jednom 65 milijuna ljudi cijepljeno na koronavirus, što je dovelo do sve većeg broja izvještaja o zdravstvenim problemima nakon cijepljenja. This situation has led to a wave of complaints against the manufacturers of vaccines. Especially in Rhineland-Palatinate, 80 complaints are currently pending, with 45 procedures still running. This has not only legal, but also health and social implications.

An example is the case of Stefan Jeremias, a 59-year-old former from Bad Marienberg. After his third Corona vaccination in July 2022, he suffered dizziness, rapid heartbeat and visual disturbances with a Moderna vaccine. Due to these symptoms, he can no longer work in his learned appointment and is permanently on sick leave. Jeremias je već prikupio oko 30.000 eura za liječenje koje nije obuhvaćeno od strane zdravstvenog osiguravajućeg društva i žali na 270.000 eura štete i naknade za bol i patnju pred Okružnim sudom Koblenz.

legal situation and hurdles in complaints

The legal hurdles for the plaintiffs are high. Tek u 10 od oko 900 slučajeva koje je do sada do sada osigurano odvjetnik Joachim Cezar-Speler za vezu između cijepljenja i štete za zdravlje, sve ostale žalbe još uvijek čekaju. Odvjetnici stoga sumnjaju u uspjeh pritužbi jer oni koji su pogođeni moraju dokazati da su njihovi zdravstveni problemi zapravo uzrokovani cijepljenjem. In 36 cases in Rhineland-Palatinate, complaints were rejected because the evidence of vaccination could not be provided as the sole cause.

No judgment against a vaccine manufacturer has been made throughout Germany. In addition, the complaints not only affect Covid 19 vaccines, but also others such as AstraZeneca. Affected people often complain about inadequate information on side effects.

political and social implications

Health disorders that are observed in connection with vaccinations range from mild side effects such as tiredness to serious complications. U Hesseu, na primjer, pokreće suđenje protiv Biontech -a, u kojem tužitelj zahtijeva 150.000 eura odštete za navodne poremećaje oštećenja srca i koncentracije. Ovi postupci ne samo postavljaju pravna, već i etička pitanja, posebno s obzirom na odgovornost proizvođača cjepiva i donositelja političke odluke.

Oko 721 prijava za prepoznavanje oštećenja cijepljenja podneseno je u Rhineland-Palatinate, od kojih je samo 17 odlučeno pozitivno. This low recognition rate reflects the general difficulties that the plaintiffs have to underpin their claims. Over 90% of the applications for government compensation are rejected, which leads to an ever increasing dissatisfaction with those affected.

The high profits of the vaccine manufacturers are in blatant contrast to the risks that they represent for the plaintiffs. Rizik od proizvođača cjepiva ozbiljno je ograničen državnom sigurnošću, što dovodi do nejednake raspodjele moći u pravnom sporu. Lawyer Caesar-Preller has asked for manufacturers to occur in comparison negotiations in order to find solutions for the vaccine victims. This requirement is part of a broader discussion about the responsibility and liability in vaccine production and the associated risks.

Nada tužitelja poput Jeremiasa jest da su predstojeći pregovori, na primjer u slučaju Jeremiasa 8. svibnja, konačno mogu biti poprilična naknada za pretrpljenu štetu.