Court sets limits: Citizens' money sanctions critically checked!

Court sets limits: Citizens' money sanctions critically checked!

A citizen benefit recipient from Munich has made a name for itself in a recently known decision by the Speyer Social Court. The man had not applied to a job at 13 points offered to him. The job center then planned to shorten its civil allowance by 30 percent because it is considered to be able to work and in need of help and has committed to actively search for work. In order to receive civil allowance, recipients usually have to “make everything” to earn their livelihood themselves, such as Merkur reported.

The affected man decided to object to the impending sanctioning, which proved to be correct. The social court found that the sanction was not justified because it had applied to the majority of job offers. In its judgment, the court made it clear that it would be illegal to sanction him for the non -application for just one offer if there were numerous other applications. As a result, his standard rate could not be shortened.

legal situation and effects of sanctions

The topic of sanctions in the citizens' money system is becoming increasingly critical. Performance reductions are often put into force if recipients violate their obligations to cooperate. The most common violations include reporting or refusal to sign a cooperation plan, as can be seen from information from Buergergeld.org . These sanctions are limited to a maximum of 30 percent of the standard requirement, which is over 168 euros per month for single people.

Another example of the problem of sanctions provided a case before the Karlsruhe Social Court. The plaintiff and her daughter lived in a small apartment and lost her citizenship for a certain period of time due to the lack of participation in the submission of requested documents. In total, that was 5,884.48 euros that were withdrawn. In the judgment, the social court criticized the application of Section 66 (1) SGB I and found that no more than 30 percent of the standard requirement may be withdrawn without an oral hearing. This shows the increasing need to check the practice of the job center.

Special focus on mental stress

dishes more indicate the serious negative consequences that can have sanctions for those affected. These range from social isolation to homelessness. Many recipients who are in difficult situations often also struggle with psychological problems that are tightened by these punishments. The social court in Karlsruhe emphasized that there are many reasons for lack of participation, including competence deficits or psychological stress.

The clear announcements of the courts could lead to the job centers rethink their approach to sanctions. In the light of these developments, the present judgments must be taken seriously in order to understand not only the legal but also the human aspects of the social benefits. Without a comprehensive examination of the consequences of sanctions, the situation could further tighten for many citizens' fees. The debate about the fairness and effectiveness of the system remains up-to-date, as well as ​​against-hartz.de explained in detail.