Musk takes stock: 130 days at the top makes Trump proud!

Musk takes stock: 130 days at the top makes Trump proud!

Now it's official: Elon Musk ended his time as a government employee on May 31, 2025 after 130 days. This short but succinct term even had its own exit when Musk was farewelled in the Oval Office by US President Donald Trump. The farewell was a bit unconventional - Musk wore a T-shirt with the inscription "Doge Father", an amusing reference to the famous mafia film "The Godfather". Trump's assessment of the leadership of the DOGE authority, which Musk leads, was entirely positive: he spoke of savings of $160 billion. An impressive sum, but one that is questioned by critics.

Independent verification of the results is rather difficult because reports about Musk's tenure often contain typos and inaccurate information. Particularly noteworthy are the approximately 280,000 terminations in the public sector that are related to Musk's authority. Many targeted cuts in various programs made critics sit up and take notice - was it really more efficient or just arbitrary? There are particular concerns about conflicts of interest, as Musk did not have to go through a Senate poll and his appointment was viewed by many as questionable.

A controversial influence

Despite the emerging skepticism, Musk remains a colorful figure in the political sphere. His popularity among Trump supporters and as a campaign donor allows him to continue to have some influence, even as he now officially fades into the background. Trump himself described Musk's departure as a loss for the government, but still plans to continue to include Musk in political decisions as a friend and advisor. A smart move, some observers say, because Musk's connection to the audience and his resource experience could be helpful in pursuing Trump's agenda.

The rapid sequence of events surrounding the DOGE authority and Musk's prominent role therefore raise a number of questions: Can a government agency really be led by such a fast, risky and controversial figure? And what real impact do the cuts and redundancies have on the public service? While the answers to this remain uncertain, it is clear that things will remain exciting until the next election.

In another context, far from the political stage, the debate about how to deal with nations ensures that discussions about international relations and their management continue to gain in importance. Loud Mirror International politics should not be compared to a personal handling of affairs, because countries should not be treated like private individuals.

The relevance of this statement remains significant in the current political landscape. As Musk ends his reign, it is becoming clear that the demands placed on leaders and the way they carry out their tasks are under constant scrutiny and must be reassessed.